imo WMF is a mid-to-large sized IT company operating on a non-pofit basis. Whoever has _both_ the skillset (and history) of reviewing IT companies and charities, both types above 100+ employees can be considered capable of reviewing WMF as a whole.
Cheers, Balazs 2014.04.25. 21:17, "Michael Peel" <em...@mikepeel.net> ezt írta: > Hi Risker, > > Thanks for your thoughts. > > > Instead I suggest that the FDC seek authorization from the Board for an > > independent third party review if it feels that there is not the > necessary > > ability for the FDC to produce its own assessment. > > I'm personally curious to know whether you have any suggestions of third > parties that might be able to carry out this sort of review, considering > the requisite knowledge of the Wikimedia movement? It might be an option > worth thinking about in future years. > > Thanks, > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
