On 27 April 2014 14:35, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Risker, 27/04/2014 19:49:
>
>  Well, no, I'm not misunderstanding.  If a staff assessment is needed, then
>> it needs to be done by staff.
>>
>
> Inappropriate metonymy here, "staff" doesn't equal "WMF staff". Anyway,
> [citation needed].
>
>

Nemo, my position is that it shouldn't be being done at all because the
request is outside of the FDC's scope, and that assessment is done, then
community assessment will be more useful than a quasi-official, partial
assessment by a conflicted group that isn't "staff", has no experience
using the analytical metrics, and doesn't have the wherewithal to do a
complete the full assessment.  The FDC does not have its own staff; it has
WMF staff appointed to assist them by creating staff assessments, in accord
with the FDC structure approved by the Board.  The FDC doesn't get to pick
who does the assessments.


Risker
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to