On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 3:06 AM, Jan Ainali <jan.ain...@wikimedia.se> wrote:

> 2014-05-20 8:41 GMT+02:00 Chad Horohoe <choro...@wikimedia.org>:
>
> > The search engine (new, as well as old) supports category intersection.
> So
> > actually, searching intersections of categories is very easy.
> >
> >
> Our definitiions of "very easy" are not intersecting :)
>
> It is possible yes, but to qualify for very easy I would suggest a GUI for
> modifying a search and a hotcat like functionality for selecting
> interescting categories. Such addition to Special:Search would be awesome.
>

I think of most the syntax that Special:Search supports as for
experts/power users.  Pretty much everything beyond quoting phrases is
non-intuitive.  I'd describe it as useful but not discoverable.

I remember seeing on a draft backlog a mention of writing some kind of more
discoverable interface for complex category queries.  I don't remember
which backlog (so no link, sorry) but I recall it being scheduled
reasonably high on the list.  I don't know what that means for when work
starts, much less when a first copy is released.  I don't even know how
well it'd work with categories being "leaves" rather than tags or
declarations of facts like I imagine you'd get with an ontology based
solution.  And I don't know how you'd get from the categories we have now
to something more like tags or facts.  I don't know lots of things....

It might be worth it to jump over category queries and implement it
directly against wikidata.  I'll be sure to talk about this with the
wikidata team when I see them later this week

One advantage that categories do have is that they are built in so whatever
more intuitive intersection mechanism we make would be useful to all
mediawiki installs willing to install the search backend.  If it is hitched
directly to wikidata the installation burden goes up considerably.  Not to
mention it'd be easier for me to test locally with categories then with
wikidata.  On the other hand having some mechanism where facts in wikidata
are reflected into the local wiki sounds a bit jangly and breakable.  On
the other other hand reflecting the facts into the local wiki would
translate them into that wiki's language which would delay the need for
some kind of translation integration (probably with wikidata as well).  On
the other other other hand that doesn't help commons be multilingual.  Or
do anything about toothbrush.

I'm going to stop rambling now and go work on something else and let my
subconscious filter through this.

Nik
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to