2014-05-29 7:46 GMT+02:00 Wil Sinclair <w...@wllm.com>: > > * I'm quite capable of thinking for myself. I am truly interested in > protecting children and preventing harassment. And I'm particularly > interested in the current state of the policies around these issues as > the leadership of the WMF changes. Old discussions might contain > outdated information. I could go on-wiki to see the current policies, > but I keep having to reply to mails like these that somehow attribute > a bunch of opinions to me that I've never expressed. > > I'm still trying to understand what I've done wrong here. I've > basically asked some questions and replied to posts that either were > directly addressed to me (as yours is here), or made extensive > reference to me (as some of the mails calling for my blocking). Let me > ask you a simple question that may help me understand where you are > coming from: do you find the questions themselves personally > upsetting? > > Thanks again! > ,Wil
Wil, if the discussions are outdated, so are the questions, since they for years already have been considered at length on-wiki with a lot of spill-off here. In order to make progress in any direction, new suggestions that can obtain consensus are needed. As far as I can see, you raise old questions without apparently showing interest in the comprehensive past treatment and without presenting any new point of view or a perspective that points to a solution. In addition, as I and others have remarked earlier, the questions basically belong to meta and not on this list. This is what I feel you 'have done wrong' and - since that takes away from my available time and from my reading about other topics here - that is what upsets me. Regards, Thyge _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>