It's interesting how much this thread reinforces what Sumana said in her
keynote at the conference!

Chris
On 8 Jun 2014 08:15, "Craig Franklin" <[email protected]> wrote:

> As someone who usually wears a suit and tie to Wikimedia events when I go
> (Hong Kong last year was the exception to that for the most part, way too
> humid), my advice to people would be to wear whatever the hell you feel
> comfortable in, subject to the normal standards of decency and the local
> climate.  If you feel comfortable in a hoodie, then wear one.  If you feel
> comfortable in a tie and monocle, then go right ahead.  Picking on people
> for their choice of clothes at a conference seems awfully petty to me.
>  Ultimately, you'll contribute more and be able to absorb more from others
> if you're not worrying about how tight your tie is or fretting over whether
> you'll be asked to leave for violating a dress code.
>
> Cheers,
> Craig "That Guy In A Suit" Franklin
>
>
> On 8 June 2014 15:50, Peter Southwood <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > And I associate hoodies with people wanting to keep their heads warm.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of edward
> > Sent: 07 June 2014 04:37 PM
> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Wikiconference USA in the media
> >
> > On 07/06/2014 15:18, Fæ wrote:
> > > So good luck to pizza stained t-shirts, wear them with pride.
> >
> > See my previous post. I thought the point was not that they had pizza
> > stained t-shirts, but rather that the Wikipedian who was interviewed
> > (Kevin) was explicitly dividing his kin into those who wear such stained
> > shorts, and those who dress in a 'chill' way, which as Mr McBride
> explains,
> > means 'cool and hip'.
> >
> >  >>these [i.e.  volunteers wearing hoodies] are the people most likely to
> > make a meaningful difference to open knowledge within the Wikimedia
> > movement.
> >
> > I don't see what the 'hoodie' bit has to do with it.  I associate
> > 'hoodies' with people who want to remain anonymous, possibly to escape
> the
> > attention of police, government agents or other responsible members of
> the
> > enforcement community charged with keeping the world safe from terrorism
> or
> > violence. Why would such people make a meaningful difference to open
> > knowledge within the Wikimedia movement?
> >
> > I'm puzzled.
> >
> > , E
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > [email protected]
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> > -----
> > No virus found in this message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 2014.0.4592 / Virus Database: 3955/7638 - Release Date: 06/07/14
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > [email protected]
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to