Hi Anders, may I suggest that you ask your good question on Wiki-Research-l?
I know some work has been done on this subject but it's not at my fingertips. https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l Pine On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Balázs Viczián <balazs.vicz...@wikimedia.hu> wrote: > Hi, > > I guess mgwp is in Malagasy, not Hungarian :) > > Cheers, > Balazs > > being done. > > > > > To ?provoke? I therefor list here my subjective impression after daily > > looking into the different version for 5-15 articles (new ones being > > created on sv.wp) (I list them in order how often I use them to calibrate > > the svwp articles). > > > > enwp- a magnitude better then any other. main weakeness are articles on > > marginal subjects that seems to be allowed to exist there, even if rather > > bad, and without templates (noone cares to patrol these?) > > > > eswp - a very good version, which in the general discussion are not > > getting appropriate credit > > > > dewp - good when the articles exist, but many serious holes. Is the > > elitist way of running it, discouraging new editors in non obvious > subjects > > (that after time passes gets very relevant)? > > frwp - also good, but somewhat scattered quality both in coverage and the > > different articles (even in same subject area) > > nlwp - very good coverage in the geographic subjects, decent quality on > > articles but limited "world" coverage in areas like biographies > > itwp - good articles but a bit italiancentered, > > > > nowp - small but decent articles. Their short focused articletext > > sometimes give more easyaccessed knowledge then an overly long one in > other > > languages > > > > ptwp - the real disappointment. it is among the top ten in volume and > > accesses but clearly missing a lot, and even existing articles are > uneven. > > I now use it even less then Ukrainian and Russian which I use very seldom > > as the different alphabet makes it hard to understand the article content > > > > (arabic, chinese and japanese I almost never use, too complicated) > > > > (I also use some smaller ones like sqwp and mgwp (hungarian), in these > > versions I have seen serious quality problems not to be found in any of > the > > above ones, I am not sure they even have basic patrolling in place) > > > > Anders > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
