On 14 June 2014 14:22, Richard Ames <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have set the moderation bit on Russavia's address for a limited time.
> I've asked Russavia to focus on issues only; in the spirit of
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Civility

Hi Richard, thanks for specifying a reason for moderation. Could you
define what you intend "limited time" to be, particularly as I believe
there is no public appeals process. A month of moderation given
"acceptable use"?

I do NOT find the word "butthurt" in any discussion acceptable, it
would be a reason for me to stop reading. However this is my "thin
skin" which I have been subject to robust public criticism for. Were
Russavia to ask me for advice on these things, I would ask that he
avoid vulgarity, it only distracts from the real points he wants to
make, which on the whole I find benefit the Wikimedia movement,
especially when we compare Russavia's dynamic actions to support
meaningful free speech, which based on recent press interviews is
exactly the same goal as Jimmy Wales.

With regard to the rationale for moderation, I would like to point out
that from *my human memory*, some current or past English Wikipedia
Arbcom members have used the word "butthurt" to describe other
editors. In comparison the far more disruptive and offensive word
"fuck" or telling editors to "fuck off" seems supported as appropriate
by the community of editors, based on discussions this year as well as
in the past (I'm recalling a discussion that was on Jimbo's talk page
and a thread on ANI when an editor used these words against Russavia).
Perhaps someone could track down an example(s) of current or past
Arbcom members using "butthurt", as it will take me a few days to get
around to running a search from scratch to provide a diff? Anyway, I'm
certain that although the civility policy mentions "rudeness", if
asked, Arbcom would not object to "butthurt" as a colloquialism in
discussion.

As this moderation appears based on the English Wikipedia's guideline
for civility, it would seem odd to moderate Russavia's access to this
list for using a word that the most trusted of Wikipedia contributors
use themselves, and defend the use by others, when they interpret the
civility guidelines. Perhaps you might think of re-stating the
rationale?

Thanks,
Fae
-- 
[email protected] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to