On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Fæ <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have taken a moment to find a relevant reference to back up my > memory, see [1] which shows Salvio giuliano vigorously defending his > use of the word "butthurt". Salvio giulano is a current English > Wikipedia Arbcom member. I have not bothered to research further use > of this word by other current or past Arbcom members. > > I think most readers of this list will find it odd to see that > "butthurt" used in a mild and colourful context on this list by > Russavia, gets highlighted and becomes a matter of objection by > Newyorkbrad, a current Arbcom member, resulting in Russavia being > moderated for an unspecified duration, while another Arbcom member has > previously stated that his use of the same rude word is perfectly > appropriate and legitimate public behaviour for himself in the rough > and tumble of frank discussion. > > Could the rationale for moderation be restated please, so that > Russavia better understands what was unacceptable about his post here, > and could we please have an idea as to what duration moderation is > expected? > > Links > 1. > https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/CheckUser_and_Oversight/2012_CUOS_appointments/OS/Salvio_giuliano&diff=499668471&oldid=499659747 > > PS I have not discussed this email with Russavia, nor has Russavia > canvassed me about it. > > Fae > -- > [email protected] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae >
This is the same discussion where you described using the word butthurt as offensive in any context, inflammatory, uncivil, disrespectful and possibly defamatory? What, again, was your complaint with Russavia being moderated for writing it? _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
