I might point out that I've perhaps needled GerardM more than most people
on this list (and even been moderated for it once years ago), but I find
his posts about WikiData interesting and I read them when I can. I think
Thomas Morton has a very good point though -- so if I may make a request:

 Whether the topic is Wikidata, or Wil, or Wikipediocracy, or pedophilia,
or whatever the drama was with Russavia, or Commons admins, or whatever it
is that raises hackles; can we all just be real for a second, and stop
feigning innocence/ignorance when we're trolling, being snarky, or posting
"innocent questions" that just so happen to cover a controversial topic, or
using misleading/distorted data to ask a pointed question? Seriously, this
list is becoming less like foundation-l and more like foxnews-l.

(To clarify this is not directed at Tomasz -- I'm just taking advantage of
his post to GerardM as being tangentially related.)

Dan

Dan Rosenthal


On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Thomas Morton <
morton.tho...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> At a guess; unpleasant snark.
>
> Tom
> On 21 Jun 2014 16:49, "Tomasz W. Kozłowski" <twkozlow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Earlier today, I used the Gmane.org gateway to send a message to this
> > mailing list in response to the "Iraqi 2014 elections thread" started
> > by GerardM.
> >
> > Here is the content of my message (typed from memory):
> >
> >     Have you tried Google yet? It is a search engine that lets
> >     you search for information easily and accurately (most of
> >     the time).
> >
> >     The Wikidata entry for Google is at
> >     <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q9366>.
> >
> >     Hope this helps!
> >
> >                     Tomasz
> >
> > I was surprised to receive a notification saying that my e-mail was
> > rejected by an unnamed moderator (as all e-mails sent to the list
> > through Gmane have to be accepted before being sent on), with the
> > following reason: "Your message was deemed inappropriate by the
> > moderator."
> >
> > I would like the unknown moderator to — please — explain to me what
> > was so inappropriate in my message that they had to reject it.
> >
> > Thank you!
> > --
> >                 Tomasz
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to