On 4 August 2014 11:40, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4 August 2014 11:03, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote: >> On 4 August 2014 10:49, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Possibly, if/when the Foundation finds out, it should first pass the >>> issue to the OTRS volunteers who handle BLP problems to examine. > >> Why would that need to be dealt with by OTRS volunteers, and not the >> community at large? > > > > Same way we deal with aggrieved emails from BLP subjects, rather than > just posting them to BLPN - if there *is* a serious concern, it's much > more likely to get the right answer without further damage.
That's because there's direct, private correspondence with the individual concerned (or their agent). I see no suggestion that that would apply in the case in question. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
