On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Fæ <[email protected]> wrote: > Current working practices on lists include never being informed that > it happened and never getting a reply to a polite request of why the > moderation is in place, along with there being no possibility of > appeal or timely review. More complex issues, such as moderators > taking action on participants with whom they are actively involved in > disputes, are not covered by any current guideline.
I do have to dispute this. While I did not explicitly say "I have set your moderation bit," and in retrospect should have, I believe that there's a fairly obvious conclusion to be drawn when a list administrator tells you that your behavior is unacceptable and your next message is not immediately posted. What I take the most issue with is that, contrary to what John has said, I did not receive a single request—polite or otherwise—from Tomasz directly, or (so far as gmail's search function can determine) any inquiry at all regarding moderation prior to John's e-mail to the list. The matter was clarified within minutes of it being brought to my attention. I don't know what, if not that, constitutes "timely review" for you, Fae. Austin _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
