Only after the last editor has been been driven away
Only after the last article written by a volunteer has been published
Only after the last vandal has been reverted by a volunteer
Then will you find that money alone cannot write an encyclopædia.

See: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weissagung_der_Cree

Regards,
Jürgen.


2014-08-14 15:42 GMT+02:00 Jan-Bart de Vreede <[email protected]>:
> Hi all,
>
> Some of you have asked the Board and its individual members for feedback. 
> Some of us are already in conversation with you or are planning to answer on 
> different pages. This is our general common statement:
>
> The Board supports the decision to protect the Media Viewer roll out. Our 
> platform powers a top-5 website. We need operational protocols that are 
> consistent with this position. This includes making improvements, rather than 
> a tendency towards reverting to the status quo.
>
> At the Board meeting before Wikimania, Lila laid out her strategy to put in 
> place best practices for product development. We will communicate sooner, we 
> will prioritize smarter, we will test more, and we will achieve better 
> outcomes. Her vision is to involve the community at each step of product 
> development, including more structured feedback stages and reviews. We 
> endorse this vision.
>
> We realize that there is concern about the superprotect user right and how it 
> affects power balance and influence on content and administration. We 
> recognize the concern that we need to explain and introduce our measures 
> better. However, stability of the platform is necessary as we seek to improve 
> our sites, and, for that reason, we support the creation of this tool. We 
> also understand that with more robust rollout plans and better staged 
> community feedback - as Lila envisions - the tool should rarely be used.
> We urge you to focus on specific improvements you'd like to see in the Media 
> Viewer and the roll-out process. Lila intends to incorporate that feedback as 
> she plans to improve Media Viewer and the process for future product roll 
> outs.
> The Wikimedia Foundation needs to be in a position to make software and 
> configuration changes for which it is responsible. We expect restrictions of 
> MediaWiki code-level editing to be a temporary step to enable us to move 
> forward with improvements. As we say, Media Viewer should be improved; our 
> procedures to date have not yet met the high standards we want to set for 
> ourselves. Lila wants to address both now, and we need to give her the space 
> to do so. She has our full support and confidence as she tackles this tough 
> challenge.
>
> On behalf of the Wikimedia Board of Trustees
>
> Jan-Bart de Vreede
> Chair
> Board of Trustees
> Wikimedia Foundation
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to