Rachel diCerbo wrote: >... > Community Engagement is continuously considering effective ways of > interacting with you around product development and would love your > suggestions. What kinds of communications from WMF would you like to see?
Please volunteer to co-mentor my GSoC proposal: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Accuracy_review There is absolutely no way I can possibly do this without a co-mentor from the WMF or WEF. It's not a hard task, and one of the major benefits I just learned yesterday is a robust implementation of per-word text attribution, which amazingly still hasn't been available to the wider community in a way that handles reverted blanking and text moves since WikiTrust went offline. Maribel Acosta, Fabian Floeck, and Andriy Rodchenko did a suitable replacement algorithm in 2013, but it hasn't been folded back into the Wikimedia Utilities distribution. Please, WMF engineering staff, remember 2.5 years ago when I was literally the only one publicly arguing that you should be paid market rate for tech workers instead of lower nonprofit worker salaries? I took so much public abuse and scorn for that for over a year until it happened. Please consider giving back by co-mentoring the accuracy review GSoC proposal. It shouldn't take more than a few hours per week over the summer. Best regards, James Salsman _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
