Tilman Bayer wrote: >Quarterly review minutes and/or slides of the following teams have >been posted in recent days: > >Multimedia: >https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarte >rly_reviews/Multimedia/January_2015 > >Legal & Community Advocacy: >https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LCA_Q2_Slides.pdf (abridged >slides only) > >Fundraising and Fundraising Tech: >https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WMF_Metrics_and_activities_meetings/Quarte >rly_reviews/Fundraising/January_2015 > >Communications: >https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Communications_WMF_Quarterly_Revie >w,_Q2_2014-15.pdf >(slides only, as a report - no actual meeting took place)
Hi. I'm trying to understand why certain groups seem to have had a formal quarterly review (with minutes on a corresponding Meta-Wiki page) and why others seem to have bypassed this process. Why wasn't there a review for two of the four groups mentioned (Communications and Legal & Community Advocacy)? Publishing slides is better than nothing, I suppose, but it seems strange to not hold a formal quarterly review for these two teams. MZMcBride _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
