I'm not convinced you offered me a better choice of venue, geni. (If you did, I missed the email.) But, then, I'm also not convinced that worrying about venue -- rather than, say, focusing on publishing with a journal that would give me the space to develop an argument at some length.
I'm not well-positioned to game out the way every snarky commenter on the sidelines will interpret anything I write or where I manage to get published. But it's worth noting that the same journal asked me to make the case for Obama's re-election back in 2012, which is also something you wouldn't expect. We may reasonably expect, given the choice of venue, that my argument will be considered quite heterodox to its regular readers, which is actually good, not bad. (Other pieces by other authors have decried net neutrality in general--I didn't do this, however, and they knew I wouldn't.) --Mike On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 5:35 AM, geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 9 April 2015 at 00:51, Mike Godwin <mnemo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> http://reason.com/archives/2015/04/08/nothing-but-net >> >> >> --Mike > > > > I'm not convinced you are helping your case with your choice of venue. > > > -- > geni _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>