2015-10-04 21:55 GMT+02:00 Theo10011 <de10...@gmail.com>: > > Those are some pretty broad leaps Pavel. They were never tasked to take > that decision. They came to a conclusion that the process is broken, they > thought to do away with the process, they picked a winner, and set about > corresponding with them, without telling anyone. Then, developed an entire > roadmap of where they want to see Wikimania next for the near foreseeable > future. All of this was never tasked to them in the first place. > > This committee isn't "community approved", their mandate isn't community > approved. Its members weren't elected, in fact, I don't know why and how > these people got on this committee, or how long they will be in-charge - > because someone certainly seems to think they are in-charge. Maybe I missed > a call or notification asking to join or approve or comment as to who > should be on this committee. > > Regards > Theo >
Theo, you argue process, I argue outcome. They faced a problem, they tackled it, they made a decission. And their mandate? They *showed up and volunteered*. That is enough mandate in my book. The revolution will not be community-approved. Pavel > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards, Pavel Richter Mobile: +49-151-19645755 Mail: m...@pavelrichter.de Twitter: @pavel <https://twitter.com/pavel> Blog: blog.pavelrichter.de _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
