On Nov 8, 2015 9:34 PM, "Quim Gil" <q...@wikimedia.org> wrote:

> the Q&A included more details:
>
>
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WMF_product_development_process/2015-11-05#When_has_been_Superprotect_used.3F
>
> The main reason to act upon Superprotect now is the updated product
> development process
> <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WMF_product_development_process> in the
> drafts, which we want to discuss and agree with the communities. This new
> process should make Superprotect unnecessary; removing it upfront was a
> logical step.
>
> I have added these points in the Q&A:
>
> Why is Superprotect being removed?
>
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WMF_product_development_process/2015-11-05#Why_is_Superprotect_being_removed.3F
>
> Why is the WMF doing this now?
>
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WMF_product_development_process/2015-11-05#Why_is_the_WMF_doing_this_now.3F
>
> I hope this clarifies that sentence.

Referring to "misbehaviour" in this context is extremely offensive; the
initial use of superprotect was not a response to "misbehaviour".
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to