it has been on fawiki for couple of month now and it does amazing Job.
Thanks for making this

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:27 PM Jane Darnell <jane...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's mentioned in the MIT Review here:
>
> http://www.technologyreview.com/news/544036/artificial-intelligence-aims-to-make-wikipedia-friendlier-and-better/
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Steven Walling <steven.wall...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > This is really cool! Congrats to everyone who worked on this.
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:51 PM Dario Taraborelli <
> > dtarabore...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> >
> > > (cross-posting from wikitech-l)
> > >
> > > Today we published an announcement on the Wikimedia blog marking the
> > > official launch of revision scoring as a service <
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service
> >
> > > and I wanted to say a few words about this project:
> > >
> > >         Blog post:
> > >
> >
> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/11/30/artificial-intelligence-x-ray-specs/
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/11/30/artificial-intelligence-x-ray-specs/
> > > >
> > >         Docs on Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES <
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/ORES>
> > >
> > > First off: what’s revision scoring <
> > >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service#Rationale
> > >?
> > > On the surface, it’s a set of open APIs allowing you to automatically
> > > “score” any edit and measure their probability of being damaging or
> > > good-faith contributions. The real goal behind this project, though, is
> > to
> > > fix the damage indirectly caused by vandal-fighting bots and tools on
> > > good-faith contributors and to bring back a collaborative dimension to
> > how
> > > we do quality control on Wikipedia. I invite you to read the whole blog
> > > post <
> > >
> >
> https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/11/30/artificial-intelligence-x-ray-specs/
> > >
> > > if you want to know more about the motivations and expected outcome of
> > this
> > > project.
> > >
> > > I am thrilled this project is coming to fruition and I’d like to
> > > congratulate Aaron Halfaker <
> > > https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/User:Ahalfaker> and all the
> project
> > > contributors <
> > >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service#Team
> > >
> > > on hitting this big milestone: revision scoring started as Aaron’s side
> > > project well over a year ago and it has been co-designed (as in –
> > literally
> > > – conceived, implemented, tested, improved and finally adopted) by a
> > > distributed team of volunteer developers, editors, and researchers. We
> > > worked with volunteers in 14 different Wikipedia language editions and
> as
> > > of today revision scores are integrated <
> > >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Revision_scoring_as_a_service#Tools_that_use_ORES
> > >
> > > in the workflow of several quality control interfaces, WikiProjects and
> > 3rd
> > > party tools. The project would not have seen the light without the
> > > technical support provided by the TechOps team (Yuvi in particular) and
> > > seminal funding provided by the WMF IEG program and Wikimedia Germany.
> > >
> > > So, here you go: the next time someone tells you that LLAMAS GROW ON
> > TREES
> > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=642215410> you
> can
> > > confidently tell them they should stop damaging <
> > > http://ores.wmflabs.org/scores/enwiki/damaging/642215410/> Wikipedia.
> > >
> > > Dario
> > >
> > >
> > > Dario Taraborelli  Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
> > > wikimediafoundation.org <http://wikimediafoundation.org/> • nitens.org
> <
> > > http://nitens.org/> • @readermeter <http://twitter.com/readermeter>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > <
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/guidelineswikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org
> > >
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/guidelineswikimedi...@lists.wikimedia.org>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to