Amaze balls.
/a

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Danny Horn <dh...@wikimedia.org> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm happy to announce that the Community Tech team's Community Wishlist
> Survey has concluded, and we're able to announce the top 10 wishes!
>
> 634 people participated in the survey, where they proposed, discussed and
> voted on 107 ideas. There was a two-week period in November to submit and
> endorse proposals, followed by two weeks of voting. The top 10 proposals
> with the most support votes now become the Community Tech team's backlog of
> projects to evaluate and address.
>
> And here's the top 10:
>
> #1. Migrate dead links to the Wayback Machine  (111 support votes)
> #2. Improved diff compare screen  (104)
> #3. Central global repository for templates, gadgets and Lua modules  (87)
> #4. Cross-wiki watchlist  (84)
> #4. Numerical sorting in categories  (84)
> #6. Allow categories in Commons in all languages  (78)
> #7. Pageview Stats tool  (70)
> #8. Global cross-wiki user talk page  (66)
> #9. Improve the "copy and paste detection" bot  (63)
> #10. Add a user watchlist  (62)
>
> You can see the whole list here, with links to all the proposals and
> Phabricator tickets:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Results
>
> So what happens now?
>
> Over the next couple weeks, Community Tech will do a preliminary
> assessment on the top 10, and start figuring out what's involved. We need
> to have a clear definition of the problem and proposed solution, and begin
> to understand the technical, design and community challenges for each one.
>
> Some wishes in the top 10 seem relatively straightforward, and we'll be
> able to dig in and start working on them in the new year. Some wishes are
> going to need a lot of investigation and discussion with other developers,
> product teams, designers and community members. There may be some that are
> just too big or too hard to do at all.
>
> Our analysis will look at the following factors:
>
> * SUPPORT: Overall support for the proposal, including the discussions on
> the survey page. This will take the neutral and oppose votes into account.
> Some of these ideas also have a rich history of discussions on-wiki and in
> bug tickets. For some wishes, we'll need more community discussion to help
> define the problem and agree on proposed solutions.
>
> * FEASIBILITY: How much work is involved, including existing blockers and
> dependencies.
>
> * IMPACT: Evaluating how many projects and contributors will benefit,
> whether it's a long-lasting solution or a temporary fix, and the
> improvement in contributors' overall productivity and happiness.
>
> * RISK: Potential drawbacks, conflicts with other developers' work, and
> negative effects on any group of contributors.
>
> Our plan for 2016 is to complete as many of the top 10 wishes as we can.
> For the wishes in the top 10 that we can't complete, we're responsible for
> investigating them fully and reporting back on the analysis.
>
> So there's going to be a series of checkpoints through the year, where
> we'll present the current status of the top 10 wishes. The first will be at
> the Wikimedia Developer Summit in the first week of January. We're planning
> to talk about the preliminary assessment there, and then share it more
> widely.
>
> If you're eager to follow the whole process as we go along, we'll be
> documenting and keeping notes in two places:
>
> On Meta: 2015 Community Wishlist Survey/Top 10:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Top_10
>
> On Phabricator: Community Wishlist Survey board:
> https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/tag/community-wishlist-survey/
>
> Finally: What about the other 97 proposals?
>
> There were a lot of good and important proposals that didn't happen to get
> quite as many support votes, and I'm sure everybody has at least one that
> they were rooting for. Again, the whole list is here:
>
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/2015_Community_Wishlist_Survey/Results
>
> We're going to talk with the other Wikimedia product teams, to see if they
> can take on some of the ideas the the community has expressed interest in.
> We're also going to work with the Developer Relations team to see if some
> of these could be taken on by volunteer developers.
>
> It's also possible that Community Tech could take on a small-scale,
> well-defined proposal below the top 10, if it doesn't interfere with our
> commitments to the top 10 wishes.
>
> So there's lots of work to be done, and hooray, we have a whole year to do
> it. If this process turns out to be a success, then we plan to do another
> survey at the end of 2016, to give more people a chance to participate, and
> bring more great ideas.
>
> For everybody who proposed, endorsed, discussed, debated and voted in the
> survey, as well as everyone who said nice things to us recently: thank you
> very much for coming out and supporting live feature development. We're
> excited about the work ahead of us.
>
> We'd also like to thank Wikimedia Deutschland's Technischer
> Communitybedarf team -- they came up with this whole survey process, and
> they've been working successfully on lots of community wishes since their
> first survey in 2013.
>
> You can watch this page for further Community Tech announcements:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Tech/News
>
> Thanks!
>
> Danny Horn
> Product Manager, WMF Community Tech
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wmfall mailing list
> wmf...@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wmfall
>
>


-- 
Anna Stillwell
Major Gifts Officer
Wikimedia Foundation
415.806.1536
*www.wikimediafoundation.org <http://www.wikimediafoundation.org>*
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to