Hoi,
<grin> it is a great shitstorm</grin> Do remember that a community chosen
representative voted the other community chosen representative out. It is
not a case of he must be good, the others are bad. It is more complicated.
Thanks,
      GerardM

On 29 December 2015 at 13:19, Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> there are bigger questions than why like;
>
>    - how can this take place
>    - how can the community ensure its representatives independence in the
>    future,
>    - what effect will this have on other elected representatives on the
>    board
>
>  The Florida statute(
> https://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2011/617.0808 ) referred
> to earlier says that If a director is elected by a class, chapter, or other
> organizational unit, or by region or other geographic grouping, the
> director may be removed only by the members of that class, chapter, unit,
> or grouping.  Do they even have ability to remove the person in the first
> place given the action of the board why are they also determining the next
> steps in the replacing our representative.
>
> Gn.
>
> On 29 December 2015 at 19:53, Thomas Goldammer <tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 2015-12-29 10:15 GMT+01:00 Isarra Yos <zhoris...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> > > It says a lot, but just what that is depends entirely on the context.
> And
> > > for community members who voted for him, that context could mean we
> > should
> > > also no longer have confidence in him elsewhere in the projects, or in
> > the
> > > board, or have no bearing on either thing whatsoever. Not knowing just
> > > means there's no indication what to trust.
> >
> >
> > I'd rather lose the trust and confidence in those 8 Board members than in
> > him without knowing what was the cause for his disbarment. ;)
> >
> > Maybe the Board by-laws have to be changed, too. Throwing out a
> > community-elected member like this, without providing a reason, is no way
> > to deal with the community who elected this member. It should be
> mandatory
> > that the Board provides reasons together with the announcement to avoid
> > exactly this kind of discussions and speculations, not a day (or more)
> > later.
> >
> > And as for no-cause disbarments for community-elected members in a
> > community-driven environment - uhm... I don't need to delve into that,
> > everyone can see the problem. The Board should just not be allowed to
> > disbar community-elected members without a cause, as that undermines the
> > authority of the community over those seats on the Board.
> >
> > Th.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to