Kevin,

I disagree with nothing you’ve said here.  What I disagreed with was the 
characterization that “certainly” something untoward had taken place.

pb


> On Jan 2, 2016, at 9:41 PM, Kevin Gorman <kgor...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Philippe -
> 
> I totally agree with you that none of my experiences with WMF suggest that
> such a thing is likely to happen.  Organizations and people change over
> time, though - similarly, this is the first time a sitting trustee has been
> dismissed.  Given the unusuality of the situation, in my opinion at least,
> given the *drastic* seriousness that something like deliberately
> withholding documents in such a manner under California state law (I can't
> speak with familiarity about Florida NPO governance,) and the fact that
> both the BoT and James could pretty easily give flat out answers to the
> question of whether or not they think it occurred, I think it's worth
> asking for those answers.
> 
> If James and the BoT agree that such withholding took place, I think it
> demands an outside review of WMF governance.  If James thinks it did, but
> the rest of the BoT disagrees.. given the general respect held for James'
> and the seriousness of the charge, I think an outside review of WMF
> governance is *still* probably reasonably necessary.  If neither thinks
> such withholding took place, then it settles a serious charge quite simply.
> 
> Best,
> KG
> 
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 7:01 PM, <phili...@beaudette.me> wrote:
> 
>> I don't believe that's "very clear" at all.  You yourself said "If what
>> Ben said is true...."  I think it's very possible - to the extent that Ben
>> cautioned against it himself - that this may be a misunderstanding.
>> 
>> In my nearly seven years at the WMF I never once saw corruption of the
>> sort you suggest. Not once. And I think it's safe to say I was well
>> connected.
>> 
>> --
>> Philippe Beaudette
>> philippe.beaude...@icloud.com
>> 
>>> On Jan 2, 2016, at 5:48 PM, Comet styles <cometsty...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We should probably start with our high and mighty leader, Jimbo, just
>>> like everyone else, He should now be 'elected' into the BoT, no more
>>> free seats..Wikimedia has now grown to an extent where we may no
>>> longer need him to run the foundation or to hold a deciding vote on
>>> issues where he has his own interests in..This problem of lacking
>>> transparency has leaked down to the lower levels of wikimedia as well,
>>> is that the example they are going to set? .. As I said before, the
>>> longer this drags on, the more likelihood of a 'manufactured' truth
>>> coming out..
>>> 
>>> People who do wrong need time to come up with a good lie....everyone
>>> knows this..James spoke the moment he was "fired" for which he was
>>> reprimanded by the same authority that 'fired' him...If what Ben
>>> Creasy said is true, then its definitely not James on the wrong here
>>> and I'd be really effing pissed if he was made a 'scapegoat' by the
>>> powers that be to save their own useless hide..Its very clear that
>>> there is corruption at the highest order at WMF....the question is..
>>> How deep does it go? ..
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Cometstyles
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to