Billing - I hope some of my earlier contributions were, well, contributions, since I do have fairly extensive training in the governance requirements of CA-based non-profits - which certainly aren't Florida-based nonprofits, but definitely share some similarities. One of the things that has concerned me is the public words of board members have pretty much entirely stressed a hope to move past this smoothly, rather than a desire to instigate even the sort of external review that the IEP resulted in. One thing that would make me pretty much shut up about the matter instantly is if, preferably the BoT as a whole, but even an individual board member, voiced a strong opinion/desire/committment to try to ensure that events that have transpired so far are subject to an outside review by a group without previous strong connections to the WMF that has a strong familiarity with Florida NPO governance, and is as transparent as possible.
Best, KG On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 8:33 PM, Richard Ames <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, please slow down the conversation and reduce the alarmist tones .... > > Regards, Richard (one of your moderators) > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 3:16 PM, billinghurst <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The whole process of James sacking from and by the Board is disturbing > > to many of us. At this point there are many who have ... much to say. > <cut> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
