On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Gerard, I believe the topic of capping costs is a reasonable one > because, simply put, there are not unlimited resources within the movement. > Some of us have the financial wherewithal to attend "on our own dime", but > many of our colleagues from around the world are not in that position.
Let's stipulate that there isn't a lot of empirical evidence proving the value of Wikimania to the movement. I think the same could be said for tens of millions of dollars in WMF spending. Considering the comparatively tiny cost of Wikimania, it makes much more sense to me for the WMF to put its own operations through a cost/benefit crucible. This is just one more example of the WMF being much more demanding on money spent outside the organization than it is on internal spending. It doesn't appear that the options presented were really fair or that the conclusions drawn from them can be considered supported; option 1 was the "give WMF complete control" option, option 2 was "get rid of Wikimania" and option 3 was "Have Wikimania every other year." I have to suspect that if there was a "have Wikimania every year, don't give WMF control" option many would have selected it. If a different organization decides to host its own Wikimania (and I don't know that the WMF "owns" the name Wikimania) in 2018, I would happily support that effort. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>