These seem like reasonable ideas, Teemu, and I don't in any way oppose them. It sounds, however, like they would go through different channels at WMF (such as the grants programs, and/or business partnerships) than the Elsevier and JSTOR programs did. Nothing wrong with that, but I wanted to be clear what it is we're talking about. -Pete [[User:Peteforsyth]] On Feb 15, 2016 11:08 AM, "Leinonen Teemu" <teemu.leino...@aalto.fi> wrote:
> > On 15.2.2016, at 18.07, Pete Forsyth <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Apart from brand affiliation, what do you see as a potential benefit from > > partnering with PLoS? > > I think brand affiliation would be a good start and could help PLoS, that > is not so well known as the Wikipedia. > > I wouldn’t be agains giving PLoS some financially supported, too, because > they are like-minded non-profit organization with very similar mission as > we have (and I am saying this without knowing anything about their > financial situation). > > - Teemu > -------------------------------------------------- > Teemu Leinonen > http://teemuleinonen.fi > +358 50 351 6796 > Media Lab > http://mlab.uiah.fi > Aalto University > School of Arts, Design and Architecture > -------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
