> On 16 Feb 2016, at 00:26, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here is another such example. Jimmy Wales has tonight told[1] a volunteer > > ---o0o--- > > First the idea that Wikidata could be used to "construct articles" with "no > need for editors to edit actual article content" is pretty absurd from a > technological point of view. Major breakthroughs in AI would be > necessary. That isn't what is intended at all, obviously.
Advertising
That seems logical. Wikidata can in principle provide basic articles that can then be improved by editors, but at the moment it's just getting up to the standard where it can provide infobox contents. Or do you think that Wikidata can provide FA-quality articles already? Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
