The "minutes" released to the public are ridiculously scant. I tried to find out more last year about the board's removing the identification requirement from those the WMF grants access to the non-public information of contributors, but ran into dead-ends. The only thing I could decipher really is that boardmember Samuel Klein raised the motion to remove the requirement.
Trillium Corsage 03.03.2016, 16:22, "Brion Vibber" <email clipped>: > On Mar 3, 2016 8:19 AM, "Pete Forsyth" <petefors...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Enjoying this discussion, glad to see it happening. One question I haven't >> seen addressed: >> >> Are there notes kept during executive sessions? > > Per the minutes policy listed on wiki yes they are kept; they are kept > separate by the secretary and not published. > > -- Brion > >> From what I've seen, it seems that the answer might be no -- and that >> doesn't seem good. Having minutes is not the same thing as publishing >> minutes; but keeping notes on private meetings, if only for the >> participants to return to when there is a need to refresh their memories > > or >> resolve disputes, seems important. >> >> For similar reasons, I like the idea of video- or audio-recording > > meetings, >> *independent* of the question of whether such recordings should be more >> widely distributed. >> >> -Pete >> [[User:Peteforsyth]] <text clipped for brevity> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>