On 2016-03-11 18:00, Sydney Poore wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
My point is that there is no clear strategy or process for prioritizing
which pages get translated. So, perhaps it is easy for some people to
But I'm pretty confident that I understand the issues, and I'm not
anything mixed up. :-)
This dynamic in the wikimedia movement needs to change. It is
We can not reach the people that the wikimedia movement needs to reach
the burden of translation of these important official WMF processes a
completely volunteer process.
Going forward, I would like to see the percentage of pages translated
metric that is tracked, reported, and discussed regularly.
Thank you, it more clear now.
However, my point is we can not translate everything to all languages.
we do not have and we will never have resources for that. We need to
prioritize. I would say in the case of the upcoming elections, it would
be great to know what languages we need to translate the documents into
- the languages spoken by the members of boards of the organizations who
actually intend to vote, and only in the case they do not speak English.
I asked this already a week ago in this very same topic of the mailing
list, and got a reply from someone (was it Amir? - sorry, I can not
easily check it now) that there is a generic list of languages important
messages get translated into. In this situation, I would say, we need
first to make a custom list for these elections - hopefully it is more
narrow than the generic list, and then see what is the best way to
proceed. I am not sure there is a general solutions - probably different
documents just need to be translated into different sets of languages.
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org