Hoi,
When it is only a nominal consideration but mostly a chuckle, what does it
say about the validity of those people and their assumptions? This is
exactly the infuriating kind of response that turns people off the
community.
Thanks,
      GerardM

On 12 March 2016 at 14:45, Marc A. Pelletier <m...@uberbox.org> wrote:

> On 2016-03-12 6:31 AM, Anthony Cole wrote:
>
>> I've lost track of where that's at.
>>
>
> Well, there was a consultation involving too few people that had a slight
> majority picking every other year out of a set of constrained options;
> followed by quite a bit of protestation; followed by the chair of the
> selection committee responding that the consultation will be given "all due
> consideration".
>
> I've very little doubt - knowing the selection committee people and their
> involvement in Wikimania since Frankfurt - that the so-called consultation
> /will/ be given all the consideration that it is due: very little, and a
> bit of chuckle.
>
> :-)
>
> -- Coren / Marc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to