The WikiProject is likely to be extended to other Wikipedias. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Accuracy Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless handheld from Glo Mobile.
-----Original Message----- From: "Peter Southwood" <peter.southw...@telkomsa.net> Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 11:18:10 To: <reachout2is...@gmail.com>; 'Wikimedia Mailing List'<wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Subject: RE: [Wikimedia-l] WikiProject Accuracy Is this restricted to en: or across all Wikipedias or something else? Is there a project discussion page somewhere? Cheers, Peter -----Original Message----- From: Wikimedia-l [mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Olatunde Isaac Sent: Friday, 25 March 2016 10:44 AM To: Wikimedia Mailing List Cc: Atsme Subject: [Wikimedia-l] WikiProject Accuracy Dear all, We seek community input on a proposed WikiProject called "WikiProject Accuracy" conceptualized by Ms. Betty Wills (User:Atsme). Following a recent discussion with Betty, I decided to bring it here for community input because of the possible controversy that may arise from establishing a WikiProject like this. The primary goals of WikiProject Accuracy are to: *Increase quality of Wikipedia articles *Increase reliability of Wikipedia articles *Promote/improve collaboration among experienced editors *Promote existing editors retention Betty's ideas are to form a team of Project Accuracy Coordinators to oversee the project, help establish criteria and minimum qualifications for fact-check teams, help with the project's page design and tasks and to form additional teams comprising appointed representatives from other project teams to help coordinate and organize a list of articles for review, and who will serve as members of Project Accuracy's Editorial Review Board (PAERB). The PAERB will be responsible for review and approval of articles nominated to bear the "reviewed and approved for accuracy" seal in the top right corner of the article. The ideas also aim to support the WMF's "Reach" campaign and help establish or re-establish credibility in Wikipedia articles that carry the RAAFA seal as a trusted source worthy of citing at all levels of academia, government, research, etc. This seem like a unique approach to improving the quality of articles on Wikipedia and increasing reliability of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia. The idea to bring experienced editors together to serve in the editorial board of the project sounds like a great way to benefit from the specialized skills of all participants. However, an editor (User:Smallbones) raised a concern on whether this is in line with the spirit of Wikipedia which permit anyone to freely edit its content at all levels. User:Smallbones said " An Editorial Review Board sounds like a very interesting idea and could be fun. But actually I think it could easily violate Wikipedia rules, such as forming some sort of exclusive club that others couldn't join without an invitation. If it's just another rating scheme (that anybody can participate in whenever they want)" I respect Smallbones concerns but I don't see a major problem with the idea of establishing an Editorial Review Board (ERB) comprising of trusted and experienced editors as board members. From the look of things, WikiProject Accuracy is likely to generate controversy among Wikipedians. The controversy will centered on whether this idea is against the vision of Wikipedia or not. Thus, we seek broader community input on this proposed project. Best, Olatunde Isaac. Manager, Wikipedia Education Program Nigeria. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless handheld from Glo Mobile. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2016.0.7497 / Virus Database: 4545/11879 - Release Date: 03/24/16 _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
