We are not trying to "incentivize sourcing articles with information that’s easy for people to check online" We are trying to use the best available sources, at least when it comes to medicine. James
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Yaroslav M. Blanter <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2016-04-22 20:31, George Herbert wrote: > >> Just saw this in The Atlantic. A suggestion Wikipedia implement a >> source verifiability meter for each article. >> >> >> http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/04/wikipedia-open-access/479364/ >> >> George William Herbert >> Sent from my iPhone >> > > Interesting reading, thanks. However, do not we already have {{no > sources}} for this purpose? > > Cheers > Yaroslav > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > -- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine www.opentextbookofmedicine.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
