I thought Stephen's original post to this list was fine, and his voice is not one that we hear very often.
Extended specific discussions about project policies or articles might be better on wikipedia-l or commons-l, but if we had a "rule" that you can never mention a specific topic on this list that could arguably be posted on another more relevant email list, there would not be much to discuss. The Science Alert post  may not be original, but perhaps some people had not thought about theories of self organizing systems applying to our projects, so worth taking a look at for that reason. Links 1. http://www.sciencealert.com/wikipedia-is-basically-just-another-old-fashioned-bureaucracy-study-finds Thanks, Fae On 30 April 2016 at 07:19, Keegan Peterzell <keegan.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why is it that when we want to be critical of our internal movement > collaborators this list is the primary vehicle for personal insult from > micro-aggressions to outright hostility, but this discussion is off-topic? > > -- > ~Keegan > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keegan > > This is my personal email address. Everything sent from this email address > is in a personal capacity. > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> -- fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae Personal and confidential, please do not circulate or re-quote. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>