On 2 May 2016 at 23:27, James Heilman <jmh...@gmail.com> wrote: ... > On the other hand, I however, had requested multiple times before the > November board meeting to see what information those 5 investigation board > members were looking at. I was denied access to these details. Some of the > documents contained key information I only become aware of in the last > couple of months.
*This* is breathtakingly crappy governance by the WMF board. Trustees are trustees, there's no "grade A" trusted trustees and lesser "grade B" less trusted trustees. We are overdue to clear out the self-selected "grade A" trustees that have become far too used to claiming that they are irreplaceable and have unique talents. There's a vast pool of community members with fantastic experience to choose from, and who have absolutely no undeclared commercial conflicts of interest, or are seeking to puff up the 'tech' side of their resumeés, so they can charge higher fees for speaking engagements or attract contracts as special advisors for politicians. Thanks for factually explaining events more clearly James. Fae -- fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>