Marc - just wanted to thank you for using "begging the question" properly!
Chris - thanks for your insight. To Anders' point, perhaps not all insights offered will be new to everyone. But where some problems or potential solutions have been identified by some, it will be nice for them to have reinforcement in a formal expert report. And to the rest of us for whom board decision-making is opaque, a governance review with a published report will be highly enlightening. On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:44 AM, marc <m...@uberbox.org> wrote: > governance consultants are very unlikely to recommend >> or support (say) live-streaming board meetings to increase transparency, >> or >> making community-elected trustees unsackable without a referendum of some >> kind >> > > Most of what you said is valuable, but I have to point out that you are > begging the question that those things are a good idea. They may well be > -- but if you reach out for expertise with a prejudice on what the > "correct" advice is, you are wasting everyone's time. > > -- Coren / Marc > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>