Brill Lyle писал 2016-06-27 04:24:
That said, it's down to the quality of the first draft. In this
instance,
the draft, in my opinion, did a disservice to the subject. Although
there
were good citations, the content of the page was not strong enough or
well
developed enough to reflect what the entity actually does. And didn't
establish notability or have the basic details needed to be up on
Wikipedia. It was a draft and belonged in a Draft, Sandbox, or user
space.
Or may be just to emphasize again David's point. Every new editor
starting an article about a living person or an existing organization
with a not-so-obvious notability is always suspected of promotional
(payed of fan-like) editing. Always. And promotional editing is always a
red tape.
As a new editor, do not start with articles which can be thought of as
promotional. Write about history, localities, natural history, improve
existing articles. Establish your name on the project. Become an
autopatrolled. Then it is much safer to go to the areas attractive for
promotional editors.
This is not how it should be, but how it is. This is so far our only
response to promotional editing.
Cheers
Yaroslav
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>