Hey Pine,

On 27 July 2016 at 08:25, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure that I agree with you. The Board and Lila ignored some
> inquiries that I made on Meta. Discussions on this mailing list seem to
> attract at least as much good-faith participation as discussions on Meta. I
> would suggest that inquiries could be made in either venue, and the Board
> can simply acknowledge and collect them for action during the governance
> review.


If I'm understanding, you're saying that you've previously left questions
on Meta which ended up going unanswered, and therefore you'd prefer to ask
questions on this mailing list to increase your chances of a response.

Increasing the number of open channels of communication also increases the
burden of monitoring those channels to ensure that nothing goes missing.
Therefore, trying to engage in two places will likely increase the chance
of something going missing, rather than decreasing. This is likely why
Nataliia has asked that feedback be given in a single location, so that she
can be sure that she can see any feedback or questions that are given. I
would encourage you to try engaging on Meta, as Nataliia suggests, rather
than here, to reduce the chances that something goes missing or ignored.

Thanks,
Dan

-- 
Dan Garry
Lead Product Manager, Discovery
Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to