On 26 February 2017 at 17:49, Tim Landscheidt <t...@tim-landscheidt.de> wrote:
> Eh, they do and that is one of the reasons to oppose the > Code of Conduct. Its draft implicitly alleges that the > technical spaces currently are a cesspit that is in urgent > need of someone with a rake while protecting actual offend- > ers by granting immunity to "neuroatypical" behaviour. This is a pretty reasonable presumption regarding technical spaces: if you *don't* have a code of conduct, it's a reasonable conclusion from outside that there will be serious unacknowledged problems. e.g. "You literally cannot pay me to speak without a Code of Conduct" http://rachelnabors.com/2015/09/01/code-of-conduct/ This is literally all well-worn discourse territory, but I'm sure if you both persist you can wear everyone down. - d. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
