but they didnt spam, nor did they introduce any false hoods, or remove
controversial content, they just put a description of the Whopper for the
opening sentence.  As Andy said rather than biting and creating arguments
amongst ourselves would it not be better to have used the opportunity to
benefit the community in a positive way.

On 14 April 2017 at 18:44, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 14 April 2017 at 11:38, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > A far better (and less WP:BITEy) outcome would be to get then to
>
>
> Pretty sure WP:BITE doesn't apply in the case of deliberate abuse for
> clear purposes of spamming.
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>



-- 
GN.
President Wikimedia Australia
WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra
Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to