On 9/26/2017 8:22 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
Perhaps I shouldn't have simplified it to "number" with the implication
that there's some magic figure, whether that's 42 or 150 or 65536. But
as with the mailing lists, sometimes it is hard to be sure that each
project has the appropriate scope when the boundaries are fluid. How and
where the community focuses its attention can be a powerful signal about
whether the scope corresponds to a widely felt need.
in the same way that say, Wikiversity languishing while Wikidata flourishes
should tell us something about the optimum number of projects we can
Did we figure out this is zero-sum? Because there are some peach projects
I'd like to replace Wikiquote & Wookiepedia with.
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com