Le 02/03/2018 à 00:46, Jean-Philippe Béland a écrit :
I think this is à propos in this discussion about how authoritative can be
the Wiktionary... here a scientific article starts by using a definition
from the Wiktionary:
http://theconversation.com/de-facebook-au-developpement-des-plantes-quand-les-reseaux-sen-melent-90891
JP
Actually one point that wasn't indicated so far, is the Wiktionnaries
have indeed not a equal quality for every single article, but where
quality is there it outstand easily any other single dictionary out
there. Also there are a growing number of words for which no definition
is given outside the Wiktionary. I think that conjugated, it might
easily accustom people to directly go look up in Wikitonary when they
need a definition, whatever its authoritative level might be.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
