Interesting metrics and ideas here, but nobody's going to take your research particularly seriously if you choose to post it in an open sewer. I'd suggest a Medium or Wordpress blog.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:44 AM sashi <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I thought I would ask if any of the junior or senior researchers here on > this mailing list have conducted previous inquiries into Wikipedia's > sourcing. > > I am currently working on a project of determining what proportion of > Wikipedia is sourced to newspapers, the military, the Church, social > media, etc. > > The data I've compiled this month, along with a brief write-up, have > been posted to Wikipediocracy: > > http://wikipediocracy.com/2018/08/26/wikipedia-sources-methods/ > > I imagine I'm reinventing the wheel... such studies have been done > before, by the WMF, with power tools (bots), right? > > Thanks for any corrections / suggestions, > > sashi > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
