Both systems are horrible. Secret trials punishing people who don't even know they are being accused, and of what they are being accused, without any chance to appeal afterwards, are nothing short of horrible and inhumane. That, yes, is plain harassment against the victims of those secret trials.
As far as I know, Arbcom is not doing that, but the WMF is. Paulo A sábado, 15 de jun de 2019, 15:37, Robert Fernandez <wikigamal...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Far better that editors deal with unfairness from secret proceedings > by untrained and unqualified volunteers of varying degrees of > incompetence elected in a popularity contest. > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 10:32 PM David Goodman <dgge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > the probability of unfairness from secret proceeding by > > anonymous paid staff is by far the worse, and I see it as in direct > > opposition to the principles underlying the entire wikipedia effort. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
