Hoi, Ask yourself why you do not get it as you describe them as "noisy". There is a photo of a presentation at the London Wikimania going round that describes it well. It is a long time coming and the chickens have come home to roost.
Indeed they are not learning the appropriate lessons but they is you. Thanks, GerardM On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 00:02, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 5:03 PM Ad Huikeshoven <a...@huikeshoven.org> wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > The Wikimedia Foundation took a bold step in banning Fram for a year. > They > > have the authority to do so. They are not obliged to give reasons. > > > > > Here's a fundamental source of disagreement. It gets at something I'm not > sure the strategy process is properly addressing. Does the WMF lead and > direct the Wikimedia movement? Or is its role to provide support and > services to the movement's contributors, who are (collectively) its > leaders? Should it impose change on projects based on its own determination > of need, or respond to needs identified by project communities? > > My impression is that the WMF views the noisy contributors who participate > in meta discussions (and, incidentally, vote for Board elections) as a > necessary evil -- and its own role as being the guarantor of the best > interests of the readers, whom the movement is intended to benefit. Their > sense of the gravity of any controversy among insiders is always tempered > by the conviction that readers are unaffected, and will ultimately benefit. > Since readers are by definition a group who cannot react to internal > politics, they have no voice to criticize any decisions taken in their > name. > > I think this becomes the true basis of the anger and resistance on the > English Wikipedia: *the sense that the WMF has declared that it is > leading now, instead of supporting*. That's also the message in comments > that assert the WMF has the authority to do what it likes, and no > obligation to explain or justify its decisions. Each time the WMF has taken > similar decisions the reaction has been similar, but as I mentioned in a > previous post... They are not learning the appropriate lessons. > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>