Hi, It has been suggested many times to ask Google for an access to their API for searching images, so that we could have a bot tagging copyright violations (no free access for automated search). That would the single best improvement in Wikimedia Commons workflow for years. And it would benefit all Wikipedia projects, big or small.
Regards, Yann Le lun. 17 juin 2019 à 17:54, Leila Zia <le...@wikimedia.org> a écrit : > Hi Benjamin, > > My name is Leila and I'm in the Research team in Wikimedia Foundation. > Please see below. > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 12:59 AM Benjamin Lees <emufarm...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > The community has been working on copyright violation issues for a long > > time. There are probably ways the WMF could support improvements in > > this area. Maybe the WMF could even design some system that would > > magically solve the problem. But it's certainly not the community > standing > > in the way. > > While I understand that you brought this up as one example within a > broader context and set of challenges, now that you have brought it > up, I'd like to ask you for a specific guidance. Can you help me > understand, in your view, what are some of the most pressing issues on > this front from the perspective of those who work to detect and > address copyright violations? (Not knowing a lot about this space, my > first thought is to have better algorithms to detect copyright > violations in Wikipedia (?) text (?) across many languages. Is this > the most pressing issue?) > > Some more info about how we work at the end of this email. > > Best, > Leila > > >  > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Autoconfirmed_article_creation_trial > >  > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyright_violations#Resources > > Also consider > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2013-November/128777.html > > back in 2013. >  > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Research/Formal_collaborations >  > To give you some more information about the context I operate in: > > * Part of the work of our team is to listen to community conversations > in lists such as wikimedia-l to find research questions/directions to > work on. If we can understand the problem space clearly and define > research questions bsaed on, we can work on priorities with the > corresponding communities and start the research on these questions > ourselves or through our Formal Collaborations program . > > * The types of problems that we can work (relatively) more quickly on > are those for which the output can be an API, data-set, or knowledge. > > * We won't start the research based on hearing the most pressing > issues from you. If we see that based on your response there is a > promising direction for further research, we will follow up (with the > corresponding parts of the community involved in this space) to learn > more about the general and specific problems. > -- Jai Jagat 2020 Grand March Coordination Team https://www.jaijagat2020.org/ +91-74 34 93 33 58 (also WhatsApp) _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>