> I think that re-imagining the governance of this movement is going to be the 
> first step towards making any sort of progress towards the goals of either 
> group.

I think this is what the Roles and Responsibilities working group was trying to 
do.



12 серпня 2019 р. 15:41:13 EEST, Adrian Raddatz <ajradd...@gmail.com> написав:
>I'm tempted to sit this one out. The Foundation has organized a bunch
>of
>working groups, staffed primarily through volunteers of various types,
>to
>present some strategic recommendations for moving forward into the
>future.
>We are a movement with flaws and opportunities for improvement, as with
>any
>large organization, and it would be a mistake for us to assume that
>because
>we found the winning formula in the early 2000s we are completely set
>for
>the future. But already, the discussions on Meta are dominated by
>representatives of The Community™ showing up with all of the usual
>toxic
>vested contributor behaviour that I've grown to know and love in my
>time
>with this movement.
>
>That said, it is apparent how broken the community/WMF governance model
>is.
>Large portions of the community feel disenfranchised on the projects
>they
>helped to create, and the WMF is increasingly separate from the
>community
>in terms of its goals and priorities. I think that re-imagining the
>governance of this movement is going to be the first step towards
>making
>any sort of progress towards the goals of either group.
>
>Adrian
>
>
>On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 7:54 AM Yury Bulka
><setthemf...@privacyrequired.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Maybe it is better to discuss specific recommendations on their talk
>> pages?
>>
>>
>>
>https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/Working_Groups/Diversity/Recommendations/9
>>
>> We might find ourselves discussing here only one specific
>recommendation
>> while the other working groups' recommendations might fade in shadows
>of
>> this particular discussion.
>>
>>
>>
>> Philip Kopetzky <philip.kopet...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > Please don't generalise frustration with your conduct on this list.
>> You're
>> > the only one telling people to shut up here.
>> >
>> > And just to keep this on track, what is your view on how we can
>> incorporate
>> > indigenous knowledge without it becoming commercialised by the
>current
>> > licensing scheme?
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> > Unsubscribe:
>https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe:
>https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>_______________________________________________
>Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
><mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

-- 
Sent from my PDP-11.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to