Hey Andreas,

On the topic of maps vs. territory...it's not beneficial to look at this
from the perspective of the WMF being a single unitary entity with a switch
that has to pick between planning and doing. This project is specifically
to develop a leadership development plan that the Community Development
team, a team which has some great people on it and a serious possibility
for good in supporting volunteers, can use to do their work effectively.
I'd much prefer that their plan be written by a diverse working group of
volunteers from across affiliates and administrative roles, than for it to
be made internally.

My point in my initial response was that the cost of this investment in
process will provide significant benefit to the Community Development
team's work over the next best option. Yes, this is not being implemented
immediately, but given the fact that the Community Development team is
tasked with working towards the "investing in skill and leadership
development" Movement Strategy recommendation, and that successful
implementation does require planning, this is the best possible way of
going about that. If you have specific feedback about how we can improve
our efficiency in this or content of the work so far, I (and the LDWG
overall) am very much open to discussion, but disagreement over the
Movement Strategy recommendation itself is not best in this venue.
Personally, given my experiences in functionary roles watching and
responding to project takeovers, hostile "leadership", etc. across
Wikimedia communities, I am really happy that there is this push to invest
in leadership resources for existing and future communities that, if we
design it right, can do a lot of good.

As for pre-imposed leadership, that's not what this is about. In your
initial comment you mentioned that there were tons of definitions out there
for leadership, and in this comment you mention that Wikipedia does not
like leadership. *That is why we made the definition.* Good Wikimedia
leadership, to the extent that word is even applicable, is far closer to
facilitation, mentorship, and resource-building than any idea of an actual
thought leader or designator of tasks. This was not something unanimously
agreed on in the working group, but it's something I tried (mostly
successfully) to ensure was reflected in the draft definition. I see this
not as an attempt to impose top-down leaders, but to guide the creation of
resources for future community facilitators, admins, etc. who can promote
the organic growth of Wikimedia communities in line with our movement's
values.

Best regards,
Rae

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User:Vermont <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Vermont> on Wikimedia
projects
they/them/theirs (why pronouns matter
<https://www.mypronouns.org/what-and-why>)


On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 2:07 PM Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Ramzy,
>
> I wanted to acknowledge your eloquent post (for anyone who hasn't read it,
> please do – DeepL and Google Translation do a really decent job), and in
> particular your concern about the lack of representation of South East
> Asian communities in movement governance.
>
> But I would also like to share one thought about the importance of
> leadership: it's that I think Wikimedians are not particularly keen on
> having leaders to follow. Projects like Wikipedia, Wiktionary and so on
> grew precisely because there *was* no leadership. They provided a space
> free of pre-imposed leadership.
>
> This is what attracted people: you could do something, contribute
> something, without having to ask an authority figure for permission. People
> were *trusted*, not *led*.
>
> This being so, I believe leadership is of limited value in terms of
> growing participation in line with this volunteer model.
>
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 12:27 PM Ramzy Muliawan <muhammadara...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Pertama-tama saya ingin mengucapkan terima kasih yang setinggi-tingginya
>> kepada Kelompok Kerja Pembinaan Kepemimpinan yang telah menghasilkan
>> definisi ini. Saya pikir ini satu langkah maju yang diperlukan untuk
>> mendorong implementasi rekomendasi Strategi Gerakan mengenai penanaman
>> modal dalam pembinaan keterampilan dan kepemimpinan.
>>
>> Berkebalikan dengan respon-respon negatif yang diterima oleh prakarsa
>> ini, saya rasa mendefinisikan bentuk kepemimpinan yang diperlukan oleh
>> gerakan Wikimedia secara luas adalah sesuatu yang sudah semestinya kita
>> miliki, sebagai sebuah gerakan antarabangsa yang memiliki jaringan dan
>> struktur tata kelola yang rumit, saling terkait, dan mengandalkan waktu
>> para sukarelawan yang berharga.
>>
>> Diskusi mengenai pembinaan kepemimpinan terutama sekali bersifat mendesak
>> untuk wilayah gerakan Wikimedia yang tidak pernah, atau kurang sekali,
>> terwakili dalam tata kelola gerakan secara global. Saya berbicara tentang
>> wilayah asal saya, rantau Asia Tenggara dan Pasifik, yang memiliki tingkat
>> keberagaman proyek Wikimedia yang sangat tinggi, barangkali hanya dapat
>> disaingi oleh beberapa wilayah lain dalam gerakan; organisasi-organisasi
>> mitra lokal yang aktif; dan basis penyunting maupun pasar pembaca yang
>> terus berkembang seiring dengan penetrasi Internet yang semakin mendalam.
>> Meski wilayah ini memiliki status-status sedemikian, Wikimediawan/wati dari
>> rantau Asia Tenggara tidak pernah ada yang berhasil duduk di Dewan Pengawas
>> Yayasan Wikimedia, dan keterwakilan dari rantau ini sangat terbatas pada
>> badan-badan tata kelola gerakan seperti Komite Afiliasi, Komite Bahasa,
>> bahkan badan yang saat ini bertugas untuk merumuskan piagam gerakan. Hal
>> ini tentu saja tidak dapat dijelaskan secara tunggal melalui "kecelakaan
>> sejarah", tetapi akan jauh lebih mudah untuk melihatnya dari lensa
>> kurangnya penanaman modal dan komitmen jangka panjang untuk urusan
>> kepemimpinan ini.
>>
>> Kerja-kerja ini tidak akan selesai dalam waktu dekat, dan tidak akan
>> menghasilkan suatu hasil akhir yang dapat memuaskan seluruh pihak yang
>> memiliki kepentingan dalam gerakan Wikimedia. Namun, apa yang dapat kita
>> lakukan tentu saja adalah mencoba terlebih dahulu. Masalah-masalah seperti
>> yang saya sebutkan di atas, dalam konteks rantau asal saya namun juga saya
>> tahu terjadi pada beberapa wilayah lain, tidak akan selesai dengan saling
>> menuding dan mempermasalahkan apakah kerja-kerja ini perlu dilakukan atau
>> tidak.
>>
>> Saya mengajak para Wikimediawan/wati yang memiliki perhatian khusus pada
>> hal ini untuk turut serta membantu Kelompok Kerja dalam diskusi yang
>> penting ini.
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2022, 14:29 Peter Southwood <peter.southw...@telkomsa.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I, too, would appreciate such enlightenment, Cheers, Peter
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Andreas Kolbe [mailto:jayen...@gmail.com]
>>> *Sent:* 16 September 2022 20:48
>>> *To:* Wikimedia Mailing List
>>> *Subject:* [Wikimedia-l] Re: Leadership Development Working Group is
>>> ready for community feedback!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Ivan,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am very sorry, but I honestly don't understand what any of this is
>>> for, and why the WMF is spending money on defining leadership – money
>>> collected under the pretence that money is urgently needed to keep
>>> Wikipedia online – given that community feedback to this initiative to date
>>> seems to be largely negative.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Leadership_Development_Working_Group
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It is not like the world lacks definitions of leadership. Aren't we
>>> spending donors' money to reinvent the wheel here?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Could I refer back to an interesting thread Samuel Klein started a while
>>> back, titled "Simplifying governance processes"?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/thread/7UVDBQTEWTR3ZNYLEP5TWAOVHF372OEL/#YRALVPPHAWMMATDUSUTZVBHG2CXOKAU6
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> To me, at least, what Samuel and others said in that thread seemed to be
>>> pertinent to initiatives like this one. Samuel started by saying,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Dear Board (and all), The growing complexity of governance efforts is
>>> defeating us. Process creep is an existential threat for projects like ours
>>> – it is self-perpetuating if not actively curtailed, as it filters out
>>> people who dislike excess process. There's a reason 'bureaucrats' and
>>> 'stewards' have unglamorous titles. Global governance in particular seems
>>> to be suffering from this now. Let's try to scale it back!"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> He received no reply from the WMF, at least not here on this list where
>>> he posted.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It seems to me we are spending a great deal of money to produce words –
>>> but not words in Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikisource etc., that the public
>>> enjoys and finds valuable, but words on Meta talking about ourselves in the
>>> best navel-gazing tradition.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now, maybe I have this all back to front and am simply clueless ... so
>>> if someone feels like enlightening me, please do!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 4:33 PM Ivan Martínez <gala...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> TL;DR: The draft leadership definition[1] prepared by the Leadership
>>> Development Working Group is ready for community feedback! Please share
>>> your feedback on Meta[2], the feedback form[3] or the Movement Strategy
>>> Forum[4]. You can also directly mail us at
>>> leadershipworkinggr...@wikimedia.org. The feedback will be collected
>>> till October 6, 2022.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hello everyone!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I hope you are aware that the Leadership Development Working Group[5]
>>> has been working over the past few months to formulate and find ways to
>>> nurture the leadership of our movement. The Leadership Development Working
>>> Group (LDWG) is a group of Wikimedia volunteers representing different
>>> communities, languages, roles, and experiences. We are pleased to inform
>>> the community that our draft definition of leadership is now available for
>>> community feedback. This first draft definition of leadership was written
>>> after months of discussion, learning, and sharing from our community
>>> perspective. The Wikimedia Movement, which is by nature diverse and
>>> distinctive in its own way, is expressly addressed by this definition.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please consider going through the definition and letting us know what
>>> you think by October 6, 2022. The draft definition includes a general
>>> definition of leadership and subcategories that elaborate on the actions,
>>> qualities, and outcomes of good leadership.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There are many places where you can express your ideas, suggestions, and
>>> comments, such as the meta talk page[2], the feedback form[3], and Movement
>>> Strategy Forum Post[4]. You can also directly mail us at
>>> leadershipworkinggr...@wikimedia.org.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You can check if the general definition, and the subcategories align
>>> with your idea of leadership in the movement. You can also try finding the
>>> gaps, maybe some qualities of a leader or anything else are missing in the
>>> draft definition or you can check if the definition applies to all
>>> cultural, linguistic, community or other contexts of the movement and share
>>> your thoughts with us.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Together, let's celebrate the movement's diverse and distinctive
>>> leadership!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] Link to the draft definition on meta
>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Leadership_Development_Working_Group/Content>
>>>
>>> [2] Link to meta talk page
>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Leadership_Development_Working_Group>
>>>
>>> [3] Link to the feedback form <https://forms.gle/o7a4FYV8ZkisJF3KA>
>>>
>>> [4] Link to the Movement Strategy Forum post
>>> <https://forum.movement-strategy.org/t/leadership-development-working-group/1404>
>>>
>>>
>>> [5] Link to the meta page of LDWG
>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Leadership_Development_Working_Group>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *Iván Martínez*
>>>
>>> *Voluntario - Wikimedia México A.C.User:ProtoplasmaKid *
>>>
>>> // Mis comunicaciones respecto a Wikipedia/Wikimedia pueden tener una
>>> moratoria en su atención debido a que es un voluntariado.
>>> // Ayuda a proteger a Wikipedia, dona ahora:
>>> https://donate.wikimedia.org
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>> Public archives at
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/HBXEEEEPUTHPIJBI5XAPB4ME4EE2O7LA/
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: width=]
>>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>
>>> Virus-free.www.avg.com
>>> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>>> Public archives at
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/XD6EN2N5EIXC22SHB5H3DSFLBBTZE2AY/
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> Public archives at
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/VDQBBQ44DRPQPKS4ECQYNAZUACDKSDTH/
>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/QLI2KNLEXHORHVN4DGU2RGRNQR6YEGH7/
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/L4PH6URBJVZV5PUT22OP5XFGABW4X6KM/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to