Yet in some countries, like mine, paying for food, renting a place, buying
a house, etc. is far cheaper than in the US, so paying a lower salary (in
USD) wouldn't amount to a lower standard of living at all, and doesn't feel
immoral, at least to me.

On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 8:00 AM Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Either we make software development cheaper somehow (move the WMF to
>> Romania or something)
>
>
> Hiring in countries with the worst labour laws and cheapest minimum wages
> is totally immoral. Especially in a community where equity is part of our
> culture we must endeavour to ensure that employees/contractors regardless
> of where they live paid fairly and equally subject to skills and
> responsibilities of the role.  WMF already has many employees that are
> based in countries where such immoral employment conditions dominate.
>
>>
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 05:49, Dan Garry (Deskana) <djgw...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I agree with much of what Amir has said here, except one little bit...
>>
>> On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 at 20:52, Amir Sarabadani <ladsgr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> And even if a software would have an owner, it used to be that the team
>>> was under so much pressure to produce new things instead of maintenance
>>> that the software would practically be without a maintainer (or worse, as
>>> even volunteers couldn't unofficially take the role). I can example a few.
>>>
>>
>> I think pressure on a team to deliver new things is *one* reason why
>> this situation has come about, but it's far from being the only one. Here's
>> a few others off the top of my head:
>>
>>    - Owning so many things that even if there was zero pressure to
>>    deliver new features, the team still couldn't maintain everything that 
>> they
>>    own.
>>    - Incredibly powerful and incredibly complex features that teams are
>>    afraid of touching lest they break them and make community members angry.
>>    - Conservatism and fear of community outrage causing reluctance to
>>    deprecate functionality.
>>    - Lack of understanding of the impact of the feature.
>>    - Lack of a clear roadmap (a list of bug reports and feature requests
>>    is not a roadmap).
>>
>> There's more but those are some that come to the top of my head. And, not
>> everyone one of those always applies to every situation, e.g. I definitely
>> don't think all of the items in your list should be deprecated!
>>
>> This causes the path of least resistance to be, for everyone involved, to
>> leave things in limbo and hope for the best.
>>
>> Dan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
>> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
>> Public archives at
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/Y4YKOLNJKWAUQFNOVMZSKDSZRORSWFNB/
>> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
>
>
>
> --
> Boodarwun
> Gnangarra
> 'ngany dabakarn koorliny arn boodjera dardoon ngalang Nyungar
> koortaboodjar'
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines
> at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> Public archives at
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/P2JSB3JJ6ZOLPMBYV3EPYDP5RALWN7O6/
> To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/OSWIMESHLJQ57TRBXAIEYTW7YLSDKX7V/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to