Dear all,
One year ago, the Movement Strategy and Governance (MSG) team at the Wikimedia 
Foundation 
launched<https://forum.movement-strategy.org/t/movement-strategy-forum-community-review/46>
 a proposal for a new Movement Strategy 
Forum<https://forum.movement-strategy.org/>. The proposal was open for a 
2-month community review period, ending on 24 July 2022. Many users expressed 
their doubts on this Forum, not because we don't need a place to discuss, but 
because this should happen inside our ecosystem (ideally, on Meta). 
Nevertheless, the MSG continued with their proposal and launched the Forum 
itself using an external platform. Their main argument was that we didn't have 
the tools for a forum-like discussion on Meta, but embracing Discourse was 
easier, cheaper and more feasible.

Some months later, starting on September 2022, a monthly report was posted in 
the forum: 
https://forum.movement-strategy.org/t/monthly-report-of-forum-activity/1665/1. 
This monthly report come, as the name suggests, every month till April: 
https://forum.movement-strategy.org/t/monthly-report-of-forum-activity/1665/13. 
The last one showed evidence that after the first months, interest, posting and 
usefulness had declined: 15 new users per month, 8 users engaged per day and 
only 6 new contributors per month. More than a third of the 49 topics created 
in March were done by the staff members. There's only one topic that could be 
counted as active and thriving, and I think it is a very interesting one: 
"Japanese connection" 
(https://forum.movement-strategy.org/t/japanese-connection/203).

As in this year there hasn't been any improvement in our platforms to have a 
better discussion forum (having a place where online discussion could happen 
should be the main goal of the MSG team), and we don't have any clue about how 
the MS Forum is going, I wonder if the lack of monthly statistics is because 
the forum is itself shrinking, or because the WMF doesn't have resources to 
continue with the reporting.

I whid that we could have a better platform to discuss and that the WMF 
invested money, resources and staff in this goal. Let's hope we see that in the 
near future.

Galder







_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org/message/5YLR7JV57L4NZVH63YFSLJXR53VPOFHT/
To unsubscribe send an email to wikimedia-l-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

Reply via email to