When google shows our data directly it is not a decrease of readers, but of users accessing our interface, (the same with AIbots), and I perceive it as all OK,,it is use of our data that is important not our interface

And look a bit closer of accesses last half year, and of different language versions, it is not a clearcut decrease.

 And I believe that your cherry picking of negative data is dangerous for us all, We should use the opportunity we have just now of all fake data among us to be prouder and more visible, and not be pessimistic and defensive

Anders



Den 2026-01-10 kl. 09:31, skrev Christophe Henner:
Anders please read my essay, readership numbers are in huge decline and it’s accelerating.

Ironically, I agree with things you say here, but not for “no cause for alarm”. When readership is over two digits decrease while Reddit is growing and AI chats product are booming, it’s alarming.

Top that with the fact that this is a trend that started almost 10 years ago and is accelerating is even worse.

And perhaps you are right, every tu ing will be fine, but data is not pointing in that direction at all.

--
Christophe


On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 9:24 AM Anders Wennersten <[email protected]> wrote:

    As i stated in an earlier thread, i see our situation very
    different, We are in  this strange world we are in, a winner and
    important holder of true fact amid all fake-news and censured
    channels.

    The donation grew by 12,5% 2024-2025 indicating the very strong
    support we have amid internet readers, and at least in en wp we
    see a growth in new users. Number of readers is about stable the
    last couple of years at the same time we see Google, now show  WP
    article directly bypassing WP interface, and AI bot is more and
    more heavily relying on the content of Wikipedia. I see nu cause
    for alarm at all, on the contrary

    Instead of being pessimistic as you indicate I suggest us being
    optimistic and  use our opportunity to be a more estabished leader
    in giving true facts

    Anders



    Den 2026-01-10 kl. 00:40, skrev Christophe Henner:

    Hey everyone,

    I struggled with the object, the most honest one would be "Last
    exit before irrelevance" but that would be a bit violent.

    So, Wikipedia turns 25 next week. I've been here for over twenty
    of those years, including stints chairing Wikimedia France and
    the Foundation Board. And honestly? I'm worried. Scared to be
    honnest.

    Over the last years, I've been regularly crunching data and
    sharing on different channels my worries. But in the last few
    weeks I decided to make a much more structured "essay" of my findings

    Since 2016, the internet nearly doubled in size.

    Our page views? Down. New editor sign-ups? Down 36%.

    The people keeping this thing running are working harder than
    ever, but there are fewer of them every year.

    I wrote it all up: the numbers, what I think went wrong, what I
    think we need to do about it. Fair warning: it's long, it's
    opinionated, and some of it will probably make you mad.

    *Here it is: *https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Schiste/what-now

    I'm not trying to be doom and gloom for the sake of it. I
    genuinely believe we have maybe two years to make some hard calls
    about AI, about money, about who we're actually serving. After
    that, the window closes and we become irrelevant.

    Could be wrong. Hope I am. But I'd rather we have this argument
    now than wish we had later. Well I'd rather we had this argument
    two or four years ago, but now we will make do.

    Read it, tell me where I'm off base. Let's argue and debate.
    That's what talk pages are for, right?

    PS: Foundation board mailing list is bcc'ed, change cannot happen
    without their commitment. And fast.

    --

    Christophe

    _______________________________________________
    Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected], guidelines 
at:https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines 
andhttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
    Public archives 
athttps://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/X3SQ2WA7QF2XS56XV2EOPDPUZ6UQPCR4/
    To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
    _______________________________________________
    Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected],
    guidelines at:
    https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
    https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
    Public archives at
    
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/PG3HS572CTT3EBXYAO7IVE4W5UGXFUN7/
    To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected], guidelines 
at:https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines 
andhttps://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives 
athttps://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/LM62OTCH2IBU32XJQU5SUEW7MLA2AU5R/
To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
Public archives at 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/WYLBGH7KHGHUJEICSTB33KVXNT4NAWOB/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to