Ah. Sorry Hilda, wrong term. I mean we should offer the reader a really nice-looking presentation of the reviewed version of the article, rather than something pulled up from the article's history. This <http://www.openmedicine.ca/article/viewFile/562/564> rather than this <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dengue_fever&oldid=629402504>.
But the more I think about this, the less important I think it is. The main thing to achieve is *a really prominent link at the top of the current version of a reviewed article linking the reader to the reviewed version*. There should be such a link at the top of the current version of any article reviewed by BMJ, but also at the top of Dengue fever <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dengue_fever>, at the top of the cancer articles that CRUK reviewed <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_CRUK> for us and at the top of all the articles <http://www.ploscollections.org/article/browse/issue/info:doi/10.1371/issue.pcol.v03.i14> Daniel Mietchen managed to get reviewed by *Computational Biology* if those involved want it*.* Whether they link to a nicely-presented, journal style edition or just the plain old Wikipedia history page is fairly trivial. Apart from a really prominent link to the reviewed version at the top of the current page, there should also be *a prominent link to a nice, readable diff between the reviewed and current versions* - so the reader can see how the topic/article has evolved since the last review. These are the things I'm hoping to get support for, if there is any opposition to them on en.Wikipedia. Anthony Cole <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthonyhcole> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Bastian, Hilda (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] < hilda.bast...@nih.gov> wrote: > G'day! > > I'm happy to support this - but can't come to London. Hoping to be at the > USA meeting though. > > Not sure what you mean by a fair copy. > > Hilda > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Anthony Cole [ahcole...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 18, 2015 9:48 PM > *To:* Wiki Medicine discussion > *Subject:* Re: [Wiki-Medicine] BMJ Wikipedia reviews > > Lodewijk, Sydney, Hilda, I think I'm going to need lots of support to pull > this off. BMJ are not publishing the reviewed version - we are, by pointing > to the relevant diff in the article's history. I'd like us to offer the > reader a much nicer presentation of the reviewed article than that, which > means Wikimedia hosting a "fair copy" (like normal articles published on > publishers' websites). > > I'd also like us to point the reader to a diff between the reviewed > version and the current version that doesn't have all the wiki markup - > basically a diff that the average reader will easily parse. > > This will only happen if we can demonstrate solid support from the > Wikipedia med community. > > I intend outlining this at the conference, if I get a slot in the Sunday > afternoon unconference. I don't suppose you guys might be able to drop > everything and turn up at the inaugural Wikipedia Science Conference in > London on 2-3 September, is there? :o) > On 15 Aug 2015 1:05 am, "Anthony Cole" <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I've just come out of the second teleconference with fellow WPMEDF board >> member Jake Orlowitz, and Fiona Godlee and Peter Ashman of BMJ. >> >> BMJ has offered to provide expert peer-review of up to 10 of our medical >> articles. We can choose the articles and can submit them at our own pace. >> I'll post the details at English Wikipedia's Wikiproject Medicine talk page >> on Monday or Tuesday - I'm very busy the next 48 hours. Have a great >> weekend everyone. >> >> >> -- >> Anthony Cole <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthonyhcole> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-Medicine mailing list > Wikimedia-Medicine@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-medicine > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-Medicine mailing list Wikimedia-Medicine@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-medicine