Pretty much what it sounds like; Mikhail and I got a ping from a coworker which was really interesting and awesome but contained as a throwaway sentence "also X says Mikhail is working on Y and that sounds really awesome, do you have any insights from your work there?"
At which point Mikhail and I looked at each other and went 'huh?' because we'd never heard of Y or seen it brought up in the context of ongoing or expected work. So this is just a note of: if there's a thing you've sort of heard is happening and you're operating under that belief, and you haven't literally seen the phabricator ticket, it's a good idea to make sure it exists. Otherwise it doesn't get done. On 28 August 2015 at 19:22, Tomasz Finc <tf...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Curious about the context. Thanks > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Mikhail Popov <mpo...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This is a gentle reminder that if your task doesn't exist as a Phabricator >> ticket, then the person/team who can get it done doesn't know there's an >> actual need for it. >> >> It allows us to avoid situations like "Person A said they think Person B is >> working on Thing X" meanwhile B has no idea X was even a thing. >> >> Thanks, >> Mikhail >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-search mailing list >> Wikimediaemail@example.com >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-search >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-search mailing list > Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-search -- Oliver Keyes Count Logula Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-search mailing list Wikimediaemail@example.com https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-search